Do you want to be informed on new Posts on this Thread? (members only)

S&S Swan Maintenance - Swan 43 Prop Size
30 September 2009 - 01:37
#1
Join Date: 04 July 2009
Posts: 45

Swan 43 Prop Size
Are any of you using a 17 inch, 3 blade MAX prop on your 43? I presently am using a 16 inch but am told by MAX prop they can increase the blade size by an inch. I'm tempted but worry it may be too much. I have REBECCA , hull # 39 built in 1970.

Thanks,

John McKay

02 October 2009 - 13:11
#2
Join Date: 02 January 2008
Posts: 1547

Dear John

The optimum propeller diameter is dependent on shaft power and rpm, and can be calculated if the specific working condition is known.

Mostly this is the full throttle full rpm condition, as the engine manufacturer wants the propeller to suit this condition, and thereby prevent overloading of the engine.

If you give engine particulars and reduction ratio I can work out which diameter would be preferable.

Do you have speed/rpm readings including full throttle with the present propeller?

Kind regards

Lars

04 October 2009 - 01:48
#3
Join Date: 04 July 2009
Posts: 45

Dear Lars,

I have a Yanmar 4JH2E (51 HP at 3600 rpm) and am pairing it with a Yanmar KM4A transmission with 2 to 1 reduction. I don't have speed/rpm info. I recently purchased REBECCA and as I am in San Diego and she is still in the Seattle area I haven't had much time to spend on her.

Thank you very much for your reply.

John McKay

04 October 2009 - 21:05
#4
Join Date: 02 January 2008
Posts: 1547

John

Would you have a more exact figure for the reduction ratio that 2:1?

Has some significance here.

Do you have an engine power curve?

Kind regards

Lars

 

07 October 2009 - 02:16
#5
Join Date: 04 July 2009
Posts: 45

Lars,

I don't have a power curve.....the reduction is 2.14. Sorry, I'm not much help on this. My boat and all the information is up in the Seattle area and I'm in San Diego.

Thanks,

JOhn

07 October 2009 - 20:37
#6
Join Date: 02 January 2008
Posts: 1547

John

Thank you for the reduction ratio, this confirms that the 20 degree setting is correct with 16" diameter

Calculation suggests that at cruising rpms there is only a small gain with 17" diameter, about 2%, but at full throttle the bigger propeller provides considerably higher thrust provided the pitch setting is 16 degrees. This choice would be particularly good in a strong headwind.

18 degrees is a little too much for the engine and would prevent it from achieving full rpm and thrust in a blow, but be fine for cruising as long as the engine is lightly loaded. The difference in cruising fuel consumption with one step larger or smaller pitch is, however, not significant.

Hope this enables you to make a decision.

Would be interested to hear what Max-Prop suggest

Lars

11 October 2009 - 18:56
#7
Join Date: 04 July 2009
Posts: 45

Lars,

Very helpful. I appreciate your time and expertise.

Thank you,

John

  • Threads : 1707
  • Posts : 10233
  • Members: 821
  • Online Members: 2